William A. Percy Foundation
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • Who we are
  • Recent Projects
    • Covid-19 in US Prisons
    • Qualitative Survey on Rape and Voluntary Sexual Activity in US Prisons (2020)
    • News & Resources: Prison Sex & Prison Rape
    • Theorizing Consent: Educational and Legal Perspectives on Campus Rape
    • Highlights on Prisoner Study (2016)
    • Research on Ancient Greek Tableware & the Roman Age of Marriage
    • Sexual Citizenship and Human Rights
  • Prison Book Donation Program
  • Opportunities to Engage
  • Contact
Search the site...
Home» News & Resources: review – Angelides: ‘The Fear of Child Sexuality’’

News & Resources: review – Angelides: ‘The Fear of Child Sexuality’’

books_angelides_fear_of_child_sexualitySteven Angelides, The Fear of Child Sexuality: Young People, Sex, and Agency (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019; 269 pp.)

This book is a must-read for anyone who recalls themselves growing up sexually during their teenage years. It is also a perfect introduction to anyone wishing to think critically about the topic of youth sexuality in the anglophone context. Steven Angelides, professor at Australia’s La Trobe University, has written many extensively researched and theoretically substantive essays in the past. These include his award winning 2004 essay Feminism, Child Sexual Abuse, and the Erasure of Child Sexuality, and related works such as The Emergence of the Paedophile in the Late Twentieth Century (2005). This book acts much like a “best of,” combining and expanding on insights and examples developed throughout the author’s corpus.

Given the title, readers could be forgiven for thinking at first glance that Angelides will be discussing fears around the sexuality of toddlers, but the author’s focus resides with adolescents and teenagers instead. Indeed, this is one of Angelides’s points. In contemporary Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) literature inflected by American standards, “child” typically refers to anyone under 18 years of age, whereas laypersons might hear “child” and erroneously think of prepubescents.

Scholars have been scathingly critical of this development when considered against global and anthropological standards of functionality, with titles such as Helmut Graupner’s The 17-Year-Old Child: An Absurdity of the Late 20th Century (2005). For Angelides: ‘the category or axis of age increasingly operates in the West as the definitive, primary marker shaping notions of childhood sexuality and sexual capacity. Age tends to subsume other conventional indices of difference’ such as sex, gender, class and race which were more readily acknowledged prior to the 1980s (p. xv). This has the effect of collapsing distinctions between the varying biological, cognitive, and agentic capacities of prepubertal, pubertal, and postpubertal persons.

The book takes readers on a journey from cultural panics around pre-marital sex to more recent controversies surrounding teenage sexting. Pre-marital sex panic is particularly bizarre and eye opening for the modern, Anglophone secular reader who cares less about whether one is married before consummating a union as compared to whether one has contraception handy. It becomes clear that anxiety and fear around youth sexuality proceeded from a discourse conceiving the young as either inherently ignorant of, or indifferent to, any potential risks of engaging in sexual behavior. The chapter makes an apt starting point, as readers are presented with cases of adults imposing their own norms, which tend to clash with those of child subjects if anyone bothers to ask them. The chapter thus develops a point of historical continuity where a tendency to speak for and over the views and experiences of youth, or in Angelides’s language, to place children’s sexual subjectivity “under erasure,” has continued into the 21st century.

Chapter 3 discusses the emergence of the “Child Sexual Abuse” (CSA) discourse in the 1980’s, and various issues relating to the erasure of child sexuality. In chapter 4, “Homosexual Pedophilia,” Angelides discusses how the figure of the pedophile has been mobilized and transformed from a rather benign figure prior to the 1970s. Since then the pedophile has come to figure omnipresent danger, with “pedophilia” commonly and incorrectly invoked as an action when the term denotes feelings and dispositions. The term has been radically divorced from its etymology “paedo” and “phile,” together literally meaning “child lover” / “lover of children,” with such feelings being explicitly borne out in recent research (Martijn et al. 2020). This shift in discourse during the 1980s was not an isolated development. Rather, Angelides delineates how discourse transformed through a huge array of scandals, movements, and discursive strategies. These include both feminist victimology discussed in chapter 3, the anti-pornography movement, and the McMartin Day Care hysteria. Alongside these movements came a vociferous right-wing homophobic backlash spearheaded by Anita Bryant’s famous “Save Our Children” and “Protect America’s Children” campaigns, which stoked fear by propagandizing the notion that gay men were pedophiles and a threat to young people. Throughout all of this, Angelides shows how discursive strategies and cultural panics function to place teenage sexual subjectivity under erasure. Instead of asking young people and letting them speak for themselves, Angelides argues that sex / moral panic discourses tend to foreclose discussion of their voices, sexuality, and agency, which often conflict with an expansive image of “the child” – a label increasingly mobilized in oversimplified and reductionist narratives that erroneously situate anyone under 18 as innocent of sexual knowledge, desire, or experience.

One of Angelides’s key insights is the claim that power is relational. One only has power in relation to other things, human or otherwise, and one cannot exist without being in relation to other things. Thus, no one exists outside of power. Power is not something owned like an object one can wield. As he writes: “Young people of all ages are not positioned outside networks of power, only to become bestowed with ‘its force’ as they age incrementally. Like all subjects they are inextricably and ceaselessly constituted and reconstituted within networks of power” (pp. 123-124). Rather, the author presents case studies as clear evidence of child subjects actively traversing and negotiating power differentials. To that effect, Angelides forwards a non-exhaustive “multidimensional model of intersubjective power relations” (p. 105) in his chapter on power.

Chapters 5 and 6 provide particularly powerful examples.

“[I]n the way that it happened, you could say I was a predator,” [Ben] Dunbar asserted confidently to Liz Hayes in a 60 Minutes interview two years after the offenses. “I mean, I went after her … I took my chances. And I just went for it.” (p. 128).

Here, Angelides takes time to delineate this particular case of teacher-student sex, it being one of many powerful indictments which present a child sexual subject subverting the idea of children’s powerlessness, inability to be sexual, or to self-sexualize. Many of Angelides’ examples involve cases of male youth both initiating and engaging sexually with older females, challenging the dominant image of an older male imposing themselves on a young female who remains innocent of sexuality and perennially risky / at risk until reaching a given age threshold. Angelides bolsters the feminist work of scholars such as Emma Renold, Jessica Ringrose, Danielle Egan, and Gail Hawkes respectively, to further illustrate how Anglophone discourses around child sexuality have renewed sexist gender and generational stereotypes that essentialize females under a given age as necessarily innocent / asexual, passive and/or non-agentic. Bringing old ideas into the 21st century, females are once again cast as mere objects who can only be acted upon, never sexual subjects until they transform on the day of their 18th birthday. Angelides’ work bravely challenges these reductive images and discourses.

Angelides’ bibliography is extensive and informative for those looking to delve deeper into the subject. His footnotes also contain comments of note. Particularly noteworthy is Angelides’ criticism of the scholar Joseph J. Fischel, author of the seminal work Sex and Harm in the Age of Consent (2016) which, as outlined by the book’s blurb, “cautions against the adoption of consent as our primary determinant of sexual freedom.” For instance, in a footnote from Fischel’s own book, the author responds to a “Consent Is Sexy poster campaign” slogan: “Sex with consent is sexy. Sex without consent is rape. Respect yourself. Respect your partner.” (footnote 33, p. 282).

Fischel writes: “Despite my respect for the ethical impulse of the campaign, it saddles consent with more normativity than it can or should bear. Sex with consent is not always sexy – sometimes it is unpleasant, mediocre, or only slightly better than the nonsexual alternatives of the moment. Sex without consent, legally defined, is not always rape. Consent might be necessary for mutual sexual respect, but certainly not sufficient. It might also be the case that mutually respectful sex dissolves consent as a salient feature of the exchange. BDSM and prostitution contracts aside, the goodness of good sex might be measured by the very degree to which consent is not tokenized or detectable as a singular moment of concession or acquiescence.” (Ibid).

Angelides’ concern is Fischel’s prescriptions surrounding power. For him, Fischel “does not question normative socio-legal assumptions about power in relationships of so-called dependence and authority” – that is, teacher-student relations. Fischel “therefore accepts the utility of the concept of sovereign power for adjudicating harm and for accurately describing the dynamics of such relationships of so-called dependence and authority. In so doing, although he advocates ‘for the creation of adolescents as a discrete class under law,’ he also argues for ‘tighter regulations around relations of dependence and authority’ (24). His argument […] reiterates the unquestioned assumption that sexual relations between teachers and students are necessarily asymmetrical with regard to power (in favor of the teacher)” (footnote 20, p. 215). If we take the voices and sexuality of child subjects seriously, rather than dismissing or ignoring them when their realities challenge western cultural assumptions, Angelides shows readers that such asymmetry need not be an inevitability.

The major criticism one could have, is precisely that the book does not address prepubertal persons who do not conform to an asexual, innocent ideal. I suspect this is because the subject is already controversial enough when limited to teenagers, and perhaps also that the author is less familiar with literature concerning prepubescents. It should be noted, however, that a relational theory of power has been explored by Naomi Holford et al., in their essay “What (else) can a kiss do? Theorizing the powerplays in young children’s sexual cultures” (2013). Researchers, anonymously, pseudonymously, or in their own names if brave or socially suicidal enough, might build on Angelides’s work by seeing gaps as opportunities. Starting points for exploration could include: Bender & Blau, 1937; Bender & Grugett, 1952, Priscilla Alderson et al.’s research on decision-making and capacity for expression (see Waites, 2005, pp. 22-32), philosophical / theoretical approaches (Leahy, 1988; 1994; 1996; Ehman, 2000; Malón, 2015; O’Carroll, 2018; Kershnar, 2001; 2015), research on love (Hatfield et al. 1988), normativity (Frayser, 1994; Friedrich et al. 1998; Rademakers et al. 2000) and development (Graaf and Rademakers, 2006), education (Yates, 1978; Blaise, 2013; Robinson, 2012), and cultural differences (Friedrich et al. 2000; Larsson et al., 2000; Johnston and Deisher, 1973, pp. 324-325; Constantine, 1977).

Further, although Angelides explains that gender norms clearly affect how an experience comes to be understood and responded to, he stops short of explicitly exploring the influence of gendered sexual socialization on the development of traumatogenic symptoms. If feelings of guilt, shame, regret or trauma can be alleviated or expunged through enacting a gendered socialization premised on empowerment that leads child subjects like Ben Dunbar to respond positively and circumvent potential adverse symptoms, then there is no excuse for failing to take up such questions in further research.

Nevertheless, the book is a cogent, well-researched, and powerful indictment of an Anglophone milieu that increasingly places the child sexual subject under erasure. In the process such a milieu has enacted a conspiracy of silence over young people’s identification as consenting agents. It has collapsed distinctions between ages and agentic capacities and wanted and unwanted experiences. As Angelides demonstrates in his chapter on sexting, it’s a society where teens are being criminalized, branded as creators and distributors of child pornography for sharing media of themselves with any hint of erotic significance. And, perhaps worse for children placed on the sex offenders’ register, it’s a discursive regime which has facilitated the expansion of the carceral state, currently burgeoning with non-violent offenders facing the omnipresent threat of indefinite incarceration and readily exploitable as psychiatric patients or cheap labor.

Against this backdrop, it is this reviewer’s hope that The Fear of Child Sexuality will prove to be what Jane Bennett’s The Enchantment of Modern Life (2001) and Vibrant Matter (2010) were to New Materialism. That is, pathbreaking and transformative. The book is a perfect introduction to the fraught and fascinating topic of youth / intergenerational sexualities, and ought to be required reading for anyone who dares to speak with any pretense of knowledge about such issues.

News and Resources

  • Canadian and US gay scholars win 2020 Warren Johansson Prize for anthology about sex on the Internet – The Foundation is pleased to announce Thomas Waugh (Concordia University, emeritus) and Brandon Arroyo (City University of New York, media studies) as the Warren Johansson Prize’s inaugural recipients for the anthology they edited, I Confess! Constructing the Sexual Self in the Internet Age (McGill Queens University Press, 2019). READ MORE HERE ...
 
  • Chicago writer Yasmin Nair to receive 2020 Charley Shively Prize for Gay Liberation – Over three decades, Chicago-based independent scholar, journalist, and activist Yasmin Nair has produced a body of queer critique unique in its wide compass, analytical clarity, resistance to cant, and Menckenian wit. READ MORE HERE ...
 
  • Transgender Wars and the Minor Child – The U.S. and other Anglophone countries have recently seen an exponential increase in young persons and their families pursuing professional therapy to prepare children as young as 12 for sex reassignment through puberty-blocking drugs, hormones, and in some cases even surgery. Credible scientific authorities have sharply varied opinions as to the wisdom of these radical approaches to treating children who present as gender dysphoric, but the full range of informed opinion and evidence is increasingly suppressed by ideological zealotry. READ MORE HERE ...
 
  • Guest Editorials – The Foundation is happy to post guest opinion pieces or reviews of notable books on topics of sexual diversity, rights, law, and history written by qualified scholars, activists, or those who have had contact with the criminal justice system. READ MORE HERE ...
 
  • Voluntary Sexual Relations Among Prisoners – Skewing male and young, and cut off from relationships and sexual outlets outside, prisoners frequently engage each other in sexual activity. In the U.S. and elsewhere around the world, voluntary sexual relationships are officially forbidden, with those caught often facing severe discipline. But prison administrators also sometimes respond with varying degrees of realism about sex among prisoners. What are the alternatives to prohibition? The articles and anecdotes here discuss the issues involved and offer data on this hard-to-assess and variable phenomenon. READ MORE HERE ...
 
  • Prison Sex & Prison Rape – A literature review, covering consensual sex, sexual victimization, conjugal visitation, and more! READ MORE HERE ...
 
  • Do Illegal Images Encourage Child Molestation? – Mere possession of child pornography (which includes images to fully sexually mature adolescents) is one of the most rapidly growing offenses prosecuted in the U.S. federal system, earning those convicted an average sentence of 12.5 years (according to Department of Justice statistics). Often, the images in question are old and feature mere nudity, little different from what is found in naturist literature and legitimate art photography. In this brief, a well-known criminologist and expert witness reviews the most recent scholarship on the question, and concludes that there is no credible link between viewing such images and committing hands-on offenses against minors. READ MORE HERE ...
 
  • Criminalization of sex workers – or their clients – both violates individual rights and prevents prostitutes and other sex workers from the regulation that has been shown to keep the "oldest profession" safe and offering a living wage. The equation of sex work with "human trafficking" – a concept heavily promoted by Western governments and NGOs but little analyzed – serves to strip sex workers of any volition and presents them as pure victims. The result in recent years has been an intensified regime of surveillance of migrants, travelers generally, sex workers, and customers – as well as large upticks in punishments in the U.S. for completely consensual activities. Sex workers and their allies around the world are organizing to fight for reasonable regulation and legal protection. READ MORE HERE ...
 
  • Transgender people face police abuse – While trans issues in the West are prominent in popular consciousness like never before, and legal barriers to fair treatment are tending to fall, police harassment and disregard, together with high levels of criminal victimization, continue. These articles offer an overview. READ MORE HERE ...
 
  • Over-the-counter contraception & youth rights – Access to contraception is a fundamental aspect of young persons' ability to make their own sexual choices. The recent articles discussed here present the scope of the problem of inaccessibility of female contraception in the U.S., E.U., and beyond, and as well, the shifting political debates and medical developments touching on the issue. READ MORE HERE ...
 
  • Battles over sex-ed – Research shows that giving young people the knowledge and tools to make informed decisions about sexuality leads to better choices, reducing unwanted pregnancies and risk of disease, while opening up space for vital discussions about feelings, relationships, and the range of human sexual responses. With a bias toward abstinence-ed in the U.S., the benefits of sex-ed often are not realized, and GLBT youth are often left out of the picture. The articles here offer an overview. READ MORE HERE ...
 
  • Mass incarceration – The U.S. represents 4.4% of the world population, but 22% of its prisoners. Unjust sentences for victimless or merely statutory offenses are a key part of the problem, together with racism and moralism about drugs and sex. Inmates face high levels of physical and sexual assault, and targets are often transgender people and others with disparaged sexual identities. READ MORE HERE ...
 
  • Fighting civil commitment – Some 7,000 individuals languish in locked facilities in the U.S. because of Kafka-esque statutes allowing indefinite detention (sex offense civil commitment) when the government has nothing more than a hunch you might in the future do something wrong of a sexual nature. Only a very small number have ever been released, even though the earliest of these facilities have existed as long as 28 years. In at least some states, more have died than have been released. In order to detain an individual for as much as the rest of their lives, the state need not prove any mental illness, only a potentially undefined mental "disorder" or a completely limitless, undefined "mental abnormality." Those who are civilly committed are, according to the Supreme Court, not being "punished," though these detention centers are usually no more than prisons, both in architecture and secured perimeters, and also in operating methods and restrictions and requirements of those confined. In a remarkable series of newsletters, The Legal Pad, a civilly-committed former attorney looks at the legal and social consequences of America's growing extra-legal gulag system. READ MORE HERE ...
 
  • Sexual minorities face more violence in prison – Incarceration tends to intensify forms of inequality and injustice prevalent in society. So it's no surprise that sexual and gender minorities often face higher rates of violence and maltreatment in jails and prisons. What's known and how are prisoners and allies taking action? READ MORE HERE ...
 
  • Fears about young people's sexuality hinder HPV vaccination efforts – HPV vaccine protects against cancers caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection – a common virus. About one in four people in the U.S. is infected, and some 14 million new infections every year. Encouraging vaccinations among young people is a public health priority, and over time could prevent more than 30,000 U.S. cancer cases a year. But vaccination campaigns face serious resistance and vaccination rates are lower than they should be. What's the problem? READ MORE HERE ...
 
  • Book reviews and commentary – What University of Michigan gay scholar David Halperin calls the “War on Sex” is generating more and more critical analysis. READ MORE HERE...
 
  • Learning from History: Lessons for activism today – The GLBT movement has been one of the most successful social movements in the West in recent generations. Yet the struggle to fight sexual injustices and hysterias – now in new guises – seems greater than ever. READ MORE HERE ...

William A. Percy Foundation for Social and Historical Studies •  1421 Park Ave., Suite 100 • Chico, California 95928 USA • +1-530-715-5125

copyright 2020 William A. Percy Foundation